(Skip the fluff …Â See page 8 in the full draft for the table with all the details, check out this one page handout,Â or read on below for context and a summary.)
Drum roll please. Â The moment you’ve been waiting for … or more likely forgot was coming. 🙂
Awhile back I (Steven Clift) led a Sunshine 2.0 effort for the national League of Women Voters to draft a set of indicators that can be measured by local league chapters to help their local governments improve their support for democracy online. With Citizens United dramatically changing the democratic scene for the League and the launch of our Inclusive Community Engagement Online effort, we’ve all been busy to say the least. Luckily or unfortunately, governments are moving slowly with open government where it actually impacts democratic transparency and public engagement in decision-making, so hopefully this build some momentum.
We started with dozens of indicatorsÂ and reviewed dozens of reports. Mid-course we switched gears and decided to keep it simple. Â So we picked ten indicative indicators that make it easier to compare how your government is doing quickly. One person or small group can just get it done instead of taking months to implement.
Now I have pushed through my major changes in the draft and sent them to the League. Whew!
Just as the drafting was done fully in public online, so to is the final draft submissionÂ (Google Doc)Â to the League. It would be great to get further feedback in the comments that we can share with them as well as to have some people try it out by using it to evaluate their local government. Below is the summary of indicators.
FOCAS 12 – Toward Open and Innovative Governance
Part of my motivation in finishing the draft is that it relates directly to Aspen Institute’s gathering next week hosted by their Forum on Communications and SocietyÂ in Aspen, Colorado. Now I have a hand-out to share.
Most of the sessions will be webcast live starting Monday, August 6th and unlike most of the off-the-record Aspen events, this one will have lots of tweeting.
Here is a clip from their press release:
â€œCitizenship and governance in 2012 can benefit from the same digital disruptions that have transformed the business world,â€ says Charlie Firestone, Executive Director of the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program. â€œThis forum will explore exciting new ways to move that process along.â€
“Technology has transformed media in the past decade from a one-to-many experience to a participatory one,” said Michael Maness, Vice President for Journalism and Media Innovation at Knight Foundation. “But we’re only beginning to tap the potential of technology to make citizenship and governance far more participatory, allowing individuals and communities to be much more engaged.”
Participants of this yearâ€™s FOCAS will include former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, President of the Republic of Estonia Toomas Hendrik Ilves, California Controller John Chiang, Ushahidi Executive Director Juliana Rotich, and Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Susan Gardner.
Â It is quite humbling to be invited a second time to an event like this. Last year Vice President Al Gore stopped by to chat with us and I recall being in line at breakfast and noting, “hey, that’s nice, someone is in jeans … oh, that’s a Supreme Court justice” (Elena Kagan was there for a different gathering on justice).
Anyway, this list of indicators is my best way after 20 years in the “e-democracy” space to say, “Ideals are nice, but let’s decide what actually matters. What must a government now do online to considered a real democracy in the 21st Century?” My take is that information transparency and data are only a part of the equation, so for some balance, here is what I proposed really matters when it comes to government support for democracy online (focused on local government, the closest government to the people.)
See page 8 in the full draft for the table with all the details.
1. Elected Officials Directory – Full contact information for all elected officials including direct e-mail address provided online
2. Election Information – A comprehensive collection of election and candidate information for voters.
3. Council Member/Mayor Web Site Section and Social Media Links
4. Electronic Notification – Option for public meetings available.
5. Meeting Documents – All official public meeting documents online before the meeting
6. Public Meeting Webcasts – Live and On-Demand
7. Direct E-Mail/Web Form Contact – Response Time Test
8. Public Online Engagement – Hosted two-way public exchange and/or policy support for government officials and civil servant use of social media in official work
9. Transparency – Key government information and accountability resources online
10. Government Spending – Detailed spending information reported regularly online
One thought on “Sunshine 2.0 – Top Ten Indicators of Local Government Support for Democracy Online Released, Aspen Institute’s FOCAS 12 Conference”
I visited the Sunshine Foundation web site today and see they have some great applications. The challenge is to make more people aware of them and teach them to use them to support their causes.
I’ve been building a platform that is intended to help people better understand what volunteer-based tutor/mentor programs are in the Chicago region, where the programs are located, what age group they serve, etc. as a tool to help bring resources to programs and help programs grow in all high poverty neighborhoods. You can see the current version of this at http://www.tutormentorprogramlocator.net/InteractiveMap.aspx
In this platform is a section where political district boundaries can be mapped. We show congressional, state senator and state legislator districts in the Chicago region. The goal of this is that the map serve as a tool elected leaders can use to help mobilize business, faith, university and philanthropic support to help grow tutor/mentor programs in areas of their district where they are needed. It’s a tool that could also be used for accountability to show what the elected leader has done to support growth of programs.
I’ve depended on volunteers to build this and the site demographics, boundaries, etc are out of date. I wonder if any one else has been trying to build a platform like this. It would seem like something Sunshine might be interested in.
There are other program locators, but I’ve not seen them built with a purpose of drawing volunteers and donors to programs listed or used to analyze the availability and distribution of programs in cities. If you know of examples post them and I’ll add them to my library.